Research context and placement

This industrial gas-membrane study addresses structural confinement and sealing. Without bioelectronic joining or host-response evidence, it is provisionally shelved only as interface-manufacturing foundations.

Boundary case: assigned to the closest interface for navigation. Read the rationale and cross-links together; the primary theme does not delimit the study. Placement of foundational work does not establish direct bioelectronic application.

Research overview and key contributions

GNR confinement and PFPE sealing control nonselective pathways in ZIF-8 membranes.

Confinement, sealing and surface fluorination provide distinct controls over gas-pair selectivity.

Membrane-treatment stages above, with intergranular channel cross-sections and PFPE molecular-interaction schematics below.
Figure 1 · Original paper figure

Overview of ZIF gas-separation membrane design using GONR layers, PFPE sealing and plasma treatment; not evidence of biological performance.

Eunji Choi, Seungho Yu, Taehwan Kim et al.. “Gas‐Specific and Tunable Hydrogen‐Selective ZIF Membrane through Combined Physical Confinement and Sealing Techniques”. Figure 1. DOI: 10.1002/smll.202501590. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Public original image copied byte-for-byte, with no resizing, cropping, annotations or re-encoding.

Source figure and caption ↗ · DOI: 10.1002/smll.202501590 ↗ · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 ↗

Noncommercial academic use with attribution and the license link; keep the original figure unchanged. Cropping, translation overlays and annotations are not included.

Open challenges

Editorial question: Does the selectivity–permeance balance persist under mixed gases, humidity, pressure and extended operation?

Comparison context

Separate pure-gas and mixture tests; match gas pair, pressure, temperature, thickness and support.

Related external research

A MOF Glass Membrane for Gas Separation

DOI: 10.1002/anie.201915807 ↗

The external abstract reports eliminating intercrystalline-defect formation by vitrifying ZIF-62; #84 confines and seals a crystalline membrane.

Framework, phase, support and gas pairs differ; separation factors alone do not establish superiority.

Abstract checked

Corresponding-author verification

Jungmok Seo: not a corresponding author

This record concerns Jungmok Seo’s correspondence designation. Author order or an asterisk alone is not treated as confirmation; this check is separate from verification of the research content.

  • Correspondence evidence source ↗

    Dae Woo Kim → _fncrsp93pmc__; Corresponding author.

    front/article-meta/contrib-group and author-notes; name-to-corresp reference and email · public_repository_xml_read

Main-text review scope
Wiley abstract, introduction and structural-design explanations were read. This is gas-separation research, not a bioelectronic validation.
Supplementary review scope
Supplementary-information content was not read in this batch. No completed review beyond the previously stated scope is claimed.
Pending verification
Verify separation conditions, stability and simulation assumptions for DOI 10.1002/smll.202501590 in school Chrome. Retain only a foundational biointerface connection.

COVERAGE & OUTREACH

Coverage and outreach

Links are checked for their relationship to this paper. Media publication does not establish independent reporting or additional experimental validation.

Channel coverage and search log for all 101 records →

Sources and verification scope

Wiley abstract, introduction and structural-design explanations were read. This is gas-separation research, not a bioelectronic validation.