Research context and placement

The abstract supports flexible SWNT/polymer X-ray sensing and transport trade-offs; flexibility alone does not establish chip joining or stretchable routing. Retain integration foundations.

Boundary case: assigned to the closest interface for navigation. Read the rationale and cross-links together; the primary theme does not delimit the study. Placement of foundational work does not establish direct bioelectronic application.

Research overview and key contributions

SWNT–polymer interfaces aid X-ray-induced charge separation, but greater loading also increases dark current and slows response.

The study couples sensitivity gains to loading-dependent signal-to-noise and temporal-stability trade-offs.

Four panels show the PET/Au/SWNT–polymer/LiF–Al stack, SEM and charge separation with and without nanotubes.
Figure 1 · Original paper figure

Device structure and charge-separation concept of a flexible polymer X-ray detector enriched with single-walled carbon nanotubes.

Heetak Han, Sanggeun Lee, Jungmok Seo et al.. “Enhancement of X-ray detection by single-walled carbon nanotube enriched flexible polymer composite”. Figure 1. DOI: 10.1186/1556-276x-9-610. CC BY 4.0. Public original image copied byte-for-byte, with no resizing, cropping, annotations or re-encoding.

Source figure and caption ↗ · DOI: 10.1186/1556-276x-9-610 ↗ · CC BY 4.0 ↗

Open challenges

Editorial question: do irradiation history, dose rate and bending shift the optimum loading?

Comparison context

Match X-ray spectrum/dose rate, bias, thickness/area and dark-current baseline.

Related external research

Organic Semiconducting Single Crystals as Next Generation of Low‐Cost, Room‐Temperature Electrical X‐ray Detectors

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201200283 ↗

Organic single crystals deliver direct room-temperature X-ray detection and stable dose-rate response, contrasting with #16’s filled-polymer strategy.

Crystal/composite thickness, bias and dose rates differ; sensitivity alone is insufficient.

Abstract checked

Corresponding-author verification

Jungmok Seo: not a corresponding author

This record concerns Jungmok Seo’s correspondence designation. Author order or an asterisk alone is not treated as confirmation; this check is separate from verification of the research content.

  • Correspondence evidence source ↗

    contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes": Taeyoon Lee

    article/front/article-meta/contrib-group; contrib[@corresp="yes"] · Named publisher author/correspondence information or public published-PDF contact block read; selected body/figure scope is recorded separately.

Main-text review scope
Publisher/PMC article license and complete Figure 1 caption actually read; original Figure 1 visually inspected. Selected body context read; not a complete methods/supplement audit.
Supplementary review scope
Not read in this figure/correspondence pass; no complete SI audit claimed.
Pending verification
Check temporal response, dark current, bending and cumulative irradiation in school Chrome. This pass verifies figure rights and correspondence roles. Selected-body/abstract review does not establish completion of full methods and supplementary-material review. The paper is not a verified Jungmok Seo correspondence paper and is outside this deepening priority.

COVERAGE & OUTREACH

Coverage and outreach

Links are checked for their relationship to this paper. Media publication does not establish independent reporting or additional experimental validation.

Channel coverage and search log for all 101 records →

Sources and verification scope

Crossref and Europe PMC/PubMed abstracts were read; the body remains unchecked.

  • Public publication baseline ↗ · #16 · 2026-10-03
  • Crossref metadata ↗: Only public bibliographic metadata registered with Crossref was checked. This does not mean that the publisher page, abstract, or full text was read; full-text verification in the school Chrome session remains pending. No license link is present in Crossref; redistribution rights have not been established.
  • Crossref — publisher-supplied abstract ↗
    publisher_registered_abstract_via_Crossref · message.abstract; actually read 2026-10-03; publisher full text not implied
  • Europe PMC — PubMed abstract record ↗
    public_abstract_via_Europe_PMC_API · resultList.result[0].abstractText; DOI matched; read 2026-10-03