Device–host response interface. Classification centers on limiting unwanted biological responses while preserving useful tissue interaction.
Examines fouling, friction, inflammation and foreign-body responses at device surfaces, together with ways to retain the intended biological interaction.
Primary assignments in this theme: 28 · Subthemes are editorial proposals for this library. Title-based classification is distinct from full-text verification.
Research on reducing nonspecific attachment and friction at device surfaces while retaining the intended biological contact.
For stent coatings, read ureteral friction and encrustation separately from biliary biofilm and occlusion. The two briefs examine different fluid environments and preclinical evaluations.
Ureteral stent coatings and encrustation: the FLUID study · Biliary stent coatings and biofilms: the ELFS study
Materials Today Bio, 39, 103405 (2026)
A lubricated ureteral-stent interface addresses bacteria, encrustation and irritation, directly fitting device–host interaction.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 18(25), 34821-34834 (2026)
A liquid interface addresses blood/mucus fouling and fogging on an endoscope cap, fitting antifouling during host contact.
Bioactive Materials, 61, 210 - 228 (2026)
The lubricated biliary-stent coating targets adhesion, biofilm and immune fibrosis; the neutrophil pathway is an immune connection within the same host theme.
Advanced Materials Interfaces, 12(14), e00353 (2025)
The medical interface centers on reduced biological fouling and friction. Industrial demolding is also included and is not itself evidence of host response.
Advanced Functional Materials, 34(14), 2312740 (2024)
The central interface reduces nonspecific adhesion and friction on deforming biomaterials. Electrical insulation and protective-layer compatibility form a secondary packaging connection.
Bioactive Materials, 25, 555-568 (2023)
The abstract explicitly concerns antifouling and low-friction medical surfaces. A coating process does not by itself establish an interconnect–component integration study.
Scientific Reports, 10, 17454 (2020)
Public text directly addresses lens blood/protein fouling and lubricant maintenance/reprocessing.
Research that evaluates or modulates inflammation, immune responses and foreign-body responses to devices or materials.
Burns & Trauma, 14, tkag055 (2026)
Immunomodulation and the wound microenvironment are central; tissue adhesion provides a secondary connection.
Advanced Functional Materials, 36(67), e77191 (2026)
Publisher-abstract evidence addresses hypoxia, macrophage states and regenerative immune responses directly. Conformal wound printing links to tissue repair; robot use alone does not establish interconnect–chip integration.
Advanced Healthcare Materials, 15(12), e04939 (2026)
Locally read stimulation, inflammatory-marker and diabetic-wound evidence directly fits host immune response. Conductive stability under deformation/hydration is verified, but the primary classification remains therapeutic response with a tissue-contact cross-link.
ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 4(4), 1449-1468 (2022)
Metadata alone supports only the existing provisional host-compatibility shelf.
Advanced Science, 8(15), 2100231 (2021)
Public text directly examines the device–host boundary through insertion friction, attachment and electrode impedance.
Science Advances, 6 (44), eabb0025 (2020)
A lubricated interface on orthopedic fixation hardware is evaluated for bacterial attachment, infection-related inflammation and bone healing. Device-surface biological responses place it within host interaction.
Biochip Journal, 14(1), 48-62 (2020)
The abstract directly categorizes foreign-body-response mitigation through softness, drugs and biomimetic surfaces.
An extended grouping for functional interactions between materials or devices and biological targets. Papers with a weak direct connection to host responses retain an ambiguity flag.
Materials Today Bio, 38, 103299 (2026)
This broader review addresses piezoelectric antibacterial platforms and host safety. It includes implant coatings, but not every case is a device–host interface, so the mapping remains qualified.
Science Advances, 11(37), eadz1228 (2025)
Lubrication and immobilized BDNF combine resistance to nonspecific attachment with neural interaction. The focus on surface–tissue responses during chronic recording supports a host-interaction assignment.
Small, 20(43), 2402431 (2024)
It separates nonspecific drug loss at lubricated channels from necessary cell attachment on the culture membrane. As an in vitro organ model, its connection to device–host response is extended and remains ambiguous.
Advanced Materials, 33(47), 2005930 (2021)
The abstract joins targeted electronic treatment with implant side effects; the broad review remains thematically provisional.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 11(23), 20615-20627 (2019)
The abstract supports host placement through HA crosslinking, CNT retention and subcutaneous responses; extending actuator-material stability to host interaction retains ambiguity.
Advanced Materials, 28 (34), 7365-7374 (2016)
Extended biological regulation through device stimulation; the graphical abstract cannot establish implant-host response or therapeutic outcomes.
A provisional grouping for foundational materials or processes that may connect to this theme. It does not establish theme fit; each paper retains a rationale and ambiguity flag.
Chemical Engineering Journal, 482, 149043 (2024)
This provisional placement follows the registered topic of osseointegration and infection. Without abstract/text, selective biological interactions and the surface mechanism remain unconfirmed.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 11 (5), 5484-5491 (2019)
The abstract establishes nonfluorinated re-entrant repellency, not biofouling or host-response outcomes.
Coatings, 8 (2), 47 (2018)
Foundational liquid-repellency review; superamphiphobicity alone does not prove antifouling or immune-response benefits.
Nano Today, 15, 91-106 (2017)
Biodistribution, degradation and toxicity relate to host interaction, but differ from the BCCI implanted-device/host interface.
Materials, 9(2), 116 (2016)
The abstract connects wetting chemistry/structure with biomedical applications, but does not establish a specific device–host response. Retain host foundations.
Chemistry of Materials, 27 (14), 4964-4971 (2015)
The public PDF supports gas-driven adhesion switching for several liquids, without biological host-response evidence. Retain host interface-control foundations.
Advanced Materials, 25 (30), 4139-4144 (2013)
Gas-controlled droplet adhesion is a surface foundation; proposed biological use is distinct from host validation.
Thin Solid Films, 527, 179-185 (2013)
Water–nanowire wetting is a surface foundation without verified protein fouling or immune response.